共享資源:管理员
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

此页解释了管理员(有时叫做admins或者sysops)在维基共享资源上的职责。请注意,此职务的的细节,以及授予管理员权限的方式,可能与其他项目不同。
如果你需要管理员的帮助,请移步管理员公告板。
现时在维基共享资源上有178 名管理员。
什么是管理员?
Administrators as of 5月 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 178
If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
技术
技术上,管理员在维基共享资源上有以下权限:
- 删除和还原图像及其他上传的文件,并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
- 删除和还原页面,并可浏览和恢复已删除的版本。
- 保护页面和解除对页面的保护,并可编辑保护级别为“仅允许管理员”的页面。
- 封禁和解封用户,进行IP地址(或IP段)的封禁。
- 編輯沒有太多限制的的界面訊息(參見界面管理員)
- 重命名文件。
- 添加和删除用户组。
- 配置上载向导。
- 彻底删除和还原特定页面的日志和历史版本。
- 从其他项目导入页面。
- 合并页面历史。
- 修改防滥用过滤器。
- 移动页面时不创建来源页面的重定向。
- 无视欺诈检查。
- 一次将一条消息发送给多个用户。(群发消息)
- 在API查询中使用更高的上限。
这些统称为管理工具。
社群角色
管理員是維基共享資源社群內有經驗的可信用戶,負責進階維護工作並且經公眾討論或投票已獲授權使用管理工具。不同的管理員有著不同的興趣和專長,但典型的管理員任務包括決策並關閉刪除請求、刪除版權違規、必要時恢復檔案、反破壞保護維基共享資源以及在模板和其他受保護頁面上作業。當然,其中有些工作也可以由非管理員完成。
管理員被期望瞭解是項目的目標,並準備著與其餘有志人士一同做出建設性的貢獻。管理員理應瞭解並遵守指引政策,在合理時尊重社群共識。
除去需要使用管理工具的時候,管理員由於個人立場不同並無特殊編輯權限,在討論或公開投票內,他們的貢獻被看作與其餘任一普通編者相同。一些管理員可能會變得更有影響力,這不是因為他們的管理員地位,而是因為他們從社群中獲得了對其個人的信任。
對管理員的建議
請詳閱管理員手冊。
移除管理员权限
根据管理员离任方针,如果管理员不活跃或者滥用管理工具,权限会被解除。 在管理员解任请求中,不适用参选管理员时判断共识的标准。而应当是使用“多数共识”,即超过50%的用户达成解任共识即可解任管理员。
申請成為管理員
所有有意願成為管理員的使用者必須經過這個過程,自薦至申請成為管理人員,包括那些想重新上任的前任管理員。
首先,前往Commons:Administrators/Howto並閱讀那裏的資訊。隨後返回並在下方的段落遞交申請。
- 點擊正確的按鈕並建立子頁面後,複製鏈接到子頁面。例如,"Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", 將 Commons:Administrators/Requests 粘貼到文段最頂部, 然後用兩個括弧包围起來 (例如 {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}} )以嵌入。可以在MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice上申请一个全站监视列表通知,或者如果你是管理员,可以编辑MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice张贴通知。
- 如果他人提名閣下,請以陳述「我同意(I accept)」或是其餘類似字樣來接受,並在提名下方簽名。子頁面仍然需要被您或是您的提名人嵌入。
使用下方的方框,並將"Username"替換成您的用戶名。 |
投票
任一註冊用戶都可以在這投票,不过那些很少甚至沒有編輯過的人的票可能不會被計算在內。閣下最好在 Support或
Oppose時都給予理由,這能幫助行政員更好地做出决策。有支持理據的論證會比簡單的投票更被看重。
上任管理员通常需要75%的支持率,并至少需要有8人同意。来自未注册用户的投票将不被计入。不管怎样,关闭个案的行政员可以自行考虑社群共识,最终决定并不只基于原始数据。如果行政员认为需要更好地确定社区共识,可以酌情延长投票的时间。
由于需计算成功或失败率, Neutral投票将不被计入投票总数。然而,这些评论是讨论的一部分,并可能会说服其他人,还有助于关闭个案的行政员更好地了解社群共识。
清除缓存使用下方的编辑链接来编辑嵌入后的页面。
申请成为管理员
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
申请成为行政员
完成后,此处列出的网页应归档至Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive。
- 在这里发表文章或投票之前,请阅读Commons:Bureaucrats。任何已登录的用户均可投票,但以前编辑次数较少或没有编辑过的用户可能不会被完全计算在内。
No current requests.
申请成为用户查核员
完成后,此处列出的页面应归档到Commons:Checkusers/Archive。
- 在这里发表文章或投票之前,请阅读Commons:Checkusers。任何已登录的用户均可投票,但以前编辑次数较少或没有编辑过的用户可能不会被完全计算在内。
Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.
We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.
Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.
- . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- --Krd 14:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for nominating me, very special to be nominated by no less than three colleague checkusers. Of course, I accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- im
ok with that request. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per TSC. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
申请成为监督员
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Tasks