User talk:The Squirrel Conspiracy

en

This user is a native English speaker.

This user is an administrator on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

This user is a checkuser on Wikimedia Commons. (verify)

This user is an administrator on Wikidata. (verify)

This user is a member of the Volunteer Response Team. (verify)

Archives —
SM: 2012 • 2013 • 2014 • 2015-19
SQ: 2020-23 • 2024 • 2025

Links —
Checkuser Wiki
{{Unfree}}, Category:Bad file message templates
Category:Images with borders
Commons:Administrators' noticeboard/Backlog
Category:Candidates for revision deletion
Abuse filter 298

Note

"Architectural composition - DPLA" series, Varon, David Jacob (1872)
File:Broadgate seen from the Cathedral Close, Exeter.jpg

Slavic map

Hello. Why did You redirected all photos of File:Slavic europe.svg with File:Slavic europe (Kosovo unshaded).svg instead of File:Slavic europe (Kosovo shaded).svg? The stable version of File:Slavic europe.svg showed Kosovo* as part of Serbia (per the UN), but now it shows everywhere (~1.000 articles) without it because CommonsDelinker redirected it to File:Slavic europe (Kosovo unshaded).svg. This is wrong on multiple principles - the map is not neutral (it shows only one side (that Kosovo is neutral) not recognized by the UN nor more than the walf of the world); and even if we choose to "recognise" Kosovo as Wikicommons - Kosovo recognises Serbia (Slavic) language as official. 77.243.27.9 19:42, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I split the original file in two to stop a revert war. I redirected the original file to the version that was in use at the time. Which one is "right" has to be decided by each local project. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 20:02, 15 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Record label logos

I am a bit curious how you decide which logos to delete Trade (talk) 22:25, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Pretty sure all the ones I've deleted recently were listed at Category:Advertisements for speedy deletion. Looks like Adamant1 is doing a lot of the tagging. If there are specific ones you think should be undeleted, bring them to UNDEL; if they actually have a valid use I don't object to their restoration. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 23:58, 17 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Surely if you delete them it means that you agree with the rationale, right? Trade (talk) 15:32, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Something is clearly bothering you but if you want me to address it you have to actually tell me what it is. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 17:38, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

The speedy deletion tagging seems to be mostly an excuse by Adamant1 to clean out Category:Logos of record labels to avoid having to properly categorize the logos by country Trade (talk) 20:57, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

"If there are specific ones you think should be undeleted, bring them to UNDE" I was explicitly told on the page that wrongful deletion isn't enough reason for files to be undeleted Trade (talk) 21:56, 18 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Babels for Wikipedia

Hello, Why did you delete the fotos that I uploaded here for my Wikipedia-profile and babels? I linked it here: https://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benutzer:Quiorm its german but you will see that there are a lot of gray spots at the bottom Quiorm (talk) 19:14, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Also, one of the photos was used in an actual articel, the Weißnackensturmvogel one. This articel is now a bit empty. Quiorm (talk) 19:22, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Quiorm: I undeleted File:Ein Weißnackensturmvogel.jpg. That was a mistake. The rest I deleted per COM:NOTWEBHOST. The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 19:54, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Can you show pictures on wikipedia without uploading it here? Quiorm (talk) 20:32, 20 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question about Dronebogus

Hi. In Commons:Administrators'_noticeboard/User_problems/Archive_116#W:WP:BOOMERANG_for_Adamant1? you had told @Dronebogus: to disengage from me. It looks like he decided to continue it in this and a couple of other deletion requests. I don't really think it's productive for him to be up my ass baselessly accusing me of harassment or making disruptive deletion nominations. So can you give him a more stern warning since he apparently didn't get the message last time? Thanks. Adamant1 (talk) 14:04, 24 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Re:AI deletion dispute

Respectfully, I disagree with your interpretation of the situation that this is just a mundane but heated content dispute between three equally at-fault parties. Adamant1 has been blocked for hostility and disruptive deletion nominations in the past. Based on User talk:Prototyperspective he nominated five AI images by Prototyperspective for deletion in the span of a few days; given the poor working relationship between these users I think it’s reasonable for Prototyperspective to read this as wikihounding. On my side of the dispute, Adamant1 accused me of “drama farming” (twice), “cry bullying” (twice) “trying to instigate things in every DR for no reason”, staging an “axe grinding harassment campaign” against him, and “trolling” in the span of three comments. Those are all serious accusations that have nothing to do with the merits of the image, and they’re mainly because I said he was being indiscriminate in his nominations— which I think is a legitimate interpretation since they tend to be rapid fire, rather sloppy DRs based solely on the fact that an image is AI generated, padded out with boilerplate arguments like “OOS” or “not a web host” and/or rambling complaints/asides. Dronebogus (talk) 06:54, 25 April 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Special:Redirect/logid/372244739

Licence reviewers already have autopatrolled, so this is redundant. Cheers, Queen of Hearts (talk) 00:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Replying

I'm really sorry for violating the copyright law. I don't know if you have the same privacy policy as Wikipedia or not, but I'm really young, I'm 12 years old, so I need simpler explainition. Please teach me, pretty please. BeastBoy-X (talk) 22:08, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

l'm a Wikipediholic, so this is my wikipatch BeastBoy-X (talk) 22:09, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]