User talk:Multichill
My Anti-RuPaul poster
[edit]Can you kindly tell me why are you taking it out, please? NoahBWill2002 (talk) 20:59, 19 December 2024 (UTC)
File:Voormalige Mariaweide Dominicanenkerk en koor, exterieur naar het noord-oosten - Venlo - 20241245 - RCE.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Voormalige Mariaweide Dominicanenkerk en koor, exterieur naar het noord-oosten - Venlo - 20241245 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 20:35, 20 December 2024 (UTC)
Happy Holidays 2024/2025!
[edit]![]() |
✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ |
Merry Christmas Hello Multichill, | |
✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ ✴ |
Verandering van datums in Structured Data
[edit]Ik heb recentelijk een reeks van uploads gedaan, waarvan ik achteraf de datum heb aangepast: van 2000-09 naar 2000-08. (naar aanleiding van File:Avignon station 2000 1.jpg) De correctie wordt niet vanzelf doorgevoerd in SD. Het vreemde is dat als het werk van de Multichill bot nakijkt in de geschiedenis, die niets doet met datum van oprichting of creatie. Ik heb een paar vragen:
- Werkt de Multichill bot de datum bij zonder iets in de geschiedenis na te laten? Of wordt de datum bijgewerkt op een andere manier?
- Is er een bot die checkt of de datum in SD nog klopt na een aanpassing?
- Is het handig om die datum in SD te verwijderen, zodat een bot de verdwenen informatie weer (correct) bijwerkt?
PS: De betrokken files staan in Category:2000 in tram transport in France en Category:Double viaduc TGV d'Avignon Smiley.toerist (talk) 14:00, 1 January 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
- File:José Gutiérrez Solana - Marineros de Castro Urdiales - LA2387 - Hispanic Society of America.jpg
And also:
Yours sincerely, Rosenzweig τ 17:12, 8 January 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Overzicht van de boerderij met toegangsbruggetje - Schalkwijk - 20384488 - RCE.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Mr.Nostalgic (talk) 05:45, 10 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Johann Zoffani - Prinz Ludwig von Parma (1773-1803) mit seinen drei ältesten Geschwistern Karoline (1770-1804), Marie - GG 2579 - Kunsthistorisches Museum.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Johann Zoffani - Prinz Ludwig von Parma (1773-1803) mit seinen drei ältesten Geschwistern Karoline (1770-1804), Marie - GG 2579 - Kunsthistorisches Museum.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ecummenic (talk) 01:18, 12 January 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, A1Cafel (talk) 03:34, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, ~TheImaCow (talk) 17:25, 19 January 2025 (UTC)
File:Atelier van Martin Meytens de Jonge - Portrait of Maria Theresa (1717-1780) - 38 - Mauritshuis.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Atelier van Martin Meytens de Jonge - Portrait of Maria Theresa (1717-1780) - 38 - Mauritshuis.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Ecummenic (talk) 19:49, 24 January 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Rudolf Levy - Knabe im Sandkasten - BG-M 3681-85 - Berlinische Galerie.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Elya (talk) 16:50, 9 February 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Phipps2.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 03:13, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 11:38, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
And also:
- File:Max Kurzweil - Christus - 6211 - Österreichische Galerie Belvedere.jpg
- File:Max Kurzweil - Der Hafen von Concarneau - 687 - Österreichische Galerie Belvedere.jpg
- File:Max Kurzweil - Der Weiher (Concarneau) - 672 - Österreichische Galerie Belvedere.jpg
- File:Max Kurzweil - Ein lieber Besuch - 8221 - Österreichische Galerie Belvedere.jpg
Yours sincerely, Yann (talk) 13:24, 24 February 2025 (UTC)
Wikimedia Commons does not accept derivative works of non-free works such as File:0582-01 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg. It only accepts free content, which is images and other media files that can be used by anyone, for any purpose. Reproductions of copyrighted works are also subject to the same copyright, and therefore this file must unfortunately be considered non-free. For more information, please read Commons:Derivative works and Commons:Freedom of panorama. You can ask questions about Commons policies in Commons:Help desk.
The file you added will soon be deleted. If you believe this file is not a derivative work of a non-free work, please explain why on the file's talk page.
|
Yours sincerely, Grandmaster Huon (talk) 15:40, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:0582-01 - Flickr - USDAgov.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 19:37, 3 March 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Khalifa royals - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Günther Frager (talk) 13:22, 8 March 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
Konons family fresco has been listed at Commons:Categories for discussion so that the community can discuss ways in which it should be changed. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry. If you created this category, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for discussion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it. If the category is up for deletion because it has been superseded, consider the notion that although the category may be deleted, your hard work (which we all greatly appreciate) lives on in the new category. In all cases, please do not take the category discussion personally. It is never intended as such. Thank you! |
186.175.224.93 02:08, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:West Bengal campaign posters - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 08:10, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Campaign banner - Flickr - Al Jazeera English.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
A1Cafel (talk) 08:11, 16 March 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:Kawanabe Kyōsai - White-Robed Kannon - 14.76.61.1 - Metropolitan Museum of Art.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Thyj (talk) 03:05, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
File:Matthew Harris Jouett - Richard Mentor Johnson - NPG.83.11 - National Portrait Gallery.jpg
[edit]![]() |
File:Matthew Harris Jouett - Richard Mentor Johnson - NPG.83.11 - National Portrait Gallery.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
PequodOnStationAtLZ (talk) 17:19, 25 March 2025 (UTC)
Follow up on US PD SDC by CuratorBot
[edit]Hi. From User talk:DaxServer/Archive 2#CuratorBot adding incorrect copyright statements, I've applied the fix to the bot and running the fixes atm. Thanks! -- DaxServer (talk) 15:32, 27 March 2025 (UTC)
- @DaxServer: thanks for picking this up. Multichill (talk) 21:18, 31 March 2025 (UTC)
Bot adding data with future dates
[edit]Hi. This File:Murales-valencia garage.jpg image was uploaded on March 10 2024. The next day, March 11 2024, Multichill bot added structured data, including a date 22 March 2024, that had not yet come https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?title=File%3AMurales-valencia_garage.jpg&diff=859489766&oldid=859439830 . Obviusly, regardless of the Exif data, which depend on the settings of the camera or device with which the file was created, a file can't be created after its upload. Shouldn't bots refrain to add future dates, or, at least, add a warning when Exif data are seen to be incorrect? Javier ME (talk) 08:20, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Javierme: the bot just extracts it from the wikitext. Upload date and exif are not used. The only checks if it's a valid date (if the Wikibase API is able to parse it). It was uploaded with the upload wizard, that should probably throw a warning about the data being in the future. Multichill (talk) 09:21, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Geographicus files
[edit]Hi, A lot of files were uploaded from Geographicus with incomplete license (only PD-Art), e.g. File:1884 Bradley Map of Montana, Wyoming and Idaho - Geographicus - MTWYID-bradley-1884.jpg. Would it be possible to fix these? I have already fixed many manually, but it is a pain. Thanks, Yann (talk) 17:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
- @Yann: back in the day (in 2011) we just used {{PD-Art}}. Updating that is quite tricky. Not sure if this can be automated. Multichill (talk) 09:48, 11 April 2025 (UTC)
Notification about possible deletion
[edit]![]() |
Some contents have been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether they should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at their entry.
If you created these pages, please note that the fact that they have been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with them, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Affected:
Yours sincerely, Omphalographer (talk) 18:18, 6 April 2025 (UTC)
JayCubby (talk) 23:56, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
![]() |
File:British (English) School - Sir John Norris (1547^–1597) - 129774 - National Trust.jpg has been listed at Commons:Deletion requests so that the community can discuss whether it should be kept or not. We would appreciate it if you could go to voice your opinion about this at its entry.
If you created this file, please note that the fact that it has been proposed for deletion does not necessarily mean that we do not value your kind contribution. It simply means that one person believes that there is some specific problem with it, such as a copyright issue. Please see Commons:But it's my own work! for a guide on how to address these issues. |
Abzeronow (talk) 00:04, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
Juiste sjabloon
[edit]Hoi Multichill,
Ik was wat bestanden uit het Stadsarchief Rotterdam aan het nalopen, en veel van hun bestanden zijn geupload als CC-0 waar ze eigenlijk als PD-old gelicenseerd moeten zijn, zoals bijvoorbeeld File:1920 Portret van mr. Wynand Adriaan Mees, kassier en makelaar in assurantiën.jpg. Ik worstel even met het juiste sjabloon: als ik {{PD-old}} gebruik zegt het sjabloon dat ik ook de licentie voor de VS toe moet voegen, en gebruik ik {{PD-old-expired}} dan zegt hij dat het bestand is gepubliceerd in de VS voor 1930. Het Stadsarchief Rotterdam heeft een mix van bestanden beschikbaar onder PD, deels omdat de fotograaf overleden is, deels omdat de (onbekende) fotograaf bij een van de plaatselijke kranten werkte en de afbeelding meer dan 70 jaar geleden is gepubliceerd. Welk licentiesjabloon kan ik daar het beste voor gebruiken? Ciell (talk) 12:54, 18 April 2025 (UTC)
- Hallo Ciell, misschien is dit sjabloon geschikt? {{PD-old-auto-1996}}. Ik zag dat zij Public Domain Mark 1.0 Universeel gebruiken in Rotterdam. Groet Peli (talk) 11:52, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Hey @Pelikana, bedankt voor het meedenken. PD vanwege ouderdom is in ieder geval correct: ik worstel met wat er *in* onze sjablonen hier staat. {{PD-old-70-expired}} lijkt een duo-sjabloon die twee verschillende situaties dekt: zowel alle landen met PD wetgeving voor 70 jaar of minder na het overlijden van de maker, alsook (en? of? en/of? geen idee wat het werkelijk betekent!) foto's die in de USA in het PD gekomen zijn vóór January 1, 1930. Dat is toch verwarrend...?
- Die welke jij voorstelt, {{PD-old-auto-1996}}, stelt in voorwaarde #3 dat de afbeelding met dat sjabloon gepubliceerd is in het eigen land voor 1926 (opmerking 3, URAA = 1996-70 jaar = foto was al in het publiek domein in 1926.). Dat is in dit geval ook niet van toepassing, meen ik - de afbeeldingen uit het Rotterdams Archief zijn uit de jaren 1930 en 1940.
- Het kan ook aan mij liggen hoor, maar ik zit hier echt even in de knoop.
Ciell (talk) 13:22, 7 May 2025 (UTC)