Dadweynaha: Saraakiisha
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Boggani wuxuu sharxayaa doorka maamulayaasha (mararka qaarkood loo yaqaan adminssysops) ee Wikimedia Commons Ogow in tafaasiisha doorka iyo habka maamulayaasha loo magacaabay ay ka duwanaan karaan goobaha kale.
"Haddii aad jeclaan lahayd inaad codsato caawimada maamulka, fadlan ku dheji Guddiga Wararka Maamulka.
Hadda waxa jira 178 admin
Maxaa ka masuul ah? ==
Administrators as of Mey 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 178
If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Farsamo =
Maamulayaashu waa isticmaalayaasha Wikimedia Commons kuwaas oo leh awood farsamo oo ay ku sameeyaan waxa soo socda:
- Tirtir oo tirtir sawirada la shubay iyo faylalka kale arag oo soo celi noocyada la tirtiray
- Tirtir oo tirtir boggaga arag oo soo celi noocyada la tirtiray.
- Wax ka beddel farriimaha is dhex galka xaddidaad yar eeg sidoo kale Commons:Interface Offices
- Magaca beddelo faylasha
- ku dar oo ka saar kooxaha isticmaalaha
- Habee ololayaasha soo dejinta
- Tirtir oo ka saar qoraalada taariikhda iyo noocyada boggaga wax laga beddelay
- Ka soo deji boggaga wikiyada kale
- Isku dhafka taariikhda bogga
- Wax ka beddel filtarrada xadgudubka
- Ha ka dhalin dib u habeyn boggaga isha marka aad guurayso boggaga
- Ka gudub jeegaga xajinta iyo ciwaanka ama liiska madow ee isticmaale
- Fariin u dir isticmaaleyaal badan hal mar (farriin)
- Adeegso xad sare ee su aalaha API
Qalabkan waxaa si wada jir ah loogu yaqaannaa aaladaha maamulka.
Doorka bulshada =
Maamulayaashu waa xubno khibrad leh oo la aamini karo oo ka tirsan bulshada Commons kuwaas oo qaata dayactir dheeraad ah waxaana lagu aaminay agabka maaraynta iyadoo la raacayo heshiis/cod dadweyne Maamulayaasha kala duwani way ku kala duwan yihiin meelaha ay xiiseeyaan iyo khibradahooda laakiin hawlaha maamulka ee caadiga ah waxaa ka mid ah aqoonsiga iyo xidhitaanka codsiyada tirtirka, tirtirida xadgudubyada xuquuqda daabacaada tirtirida faylasha marka loo baahdo ka ilaalinta Commons kharribaadda iyo ka shaqaynta qaabdhismeedka iyo boggaga kale ee la ilaaliyo Dabcan kuwa aan maamulka ahayn ayaa sidoo kale qaban kara qaar ka mid ah hawlahan.
Maamulayaasha waxa laga filayaa inay fahmaan goals mashruucan oo ay u diyaar garoobaan inay si wax dhis leh ula shaqeeyaan kuwa kale si loo gaadho yoolalkan Maamulayaashu waa inay sidoo kale fahmaan oo raacaan Commons:Policy and Guides
Marka laga reebo doorarka u baahan adeegsiga agabka maaraynta dhexdhexaadiyeyaashu ma laha awood tafatir oo gaar ah oo hore oo xafiiseed doodaha dadweynaha iyo cod bixinta waxa ay ku darsanayaan waxaa loola dhaqmaa si la mid ah tifaftirayaasha caadiga ah Dhexdhexaadiyeyaasha qaarkood ayaa laga yaabaa inay noqdaan kuwo saameyn badan leh ma aha sababtoo ah jagada laakiin kalsoonida shakhsi ahaaneed ee laga yaabo inay ka helaan bulshada.
Talo soo jeedin ku socota maamulayaasha
Fadlan akhri Commons:Hagaha Maamulka.
Xuquuqda maamulka ka saar
Sida hoos timaada siyaasada de-admin xuquuqaha maamulka waa lagala noqon karaa dhaqdhaqaaq la aanta ama si xun u isticmaalka qalabka sysop. Gudaha RFP shuruudaha caadiga ah ee lagu go aaminayo la isku raacsan yahay ee RFP kuma jiraan Taa baddalkeeda " isku raacsanaanta aqlabiyadda waa in la isticmaalo" halkaasoo heshiis kasta oo hoos u dhigista ka sarreeya 50% uu ku filan yahay in meesha laga saaro maamulka.
Codso si aad u noqoto maamule
Dhammaan maamulayaasha mustaqbalka waa in ay maraan nidaamkan oo ay isbartaan RFA oo ay ku jiraan dhammaan maamulayaashii hore ee doonaya in ay ku soo laabtaan doorkoodii hore.
Marka hore aad Commons:Administrators/Howto oo akhri macluumaadka halkaas Kadib ku soo noqo halkan oo ku soo gudbi codsigaaga qaybta hoose.
- Kadib markaad gujiso badhanka ku habboon oo aad samaysato bogga-hoosaadka koobiyayso xidhiidhka bogga-hoosaadka sida "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username" dabadeed tafatir Commons:Administrators/Requests oo ku dheji dusha sare ee qaybta ka dibna ku dheji dhejisyada qaloocan (tusaale {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) transclude Ka codso ogeysiinta liiska daawashada MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice ama wax ka beddel MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice si aad ogeysiis u geliso haddii aad tahay maamule.
- Haddii uu qof kale kuu magacaabo fadlan aqbal magacaabista adiga oo sheegaya "Waan oggolahay" ama wax la mid ah saxiixna hoosta magacaabista lafteeda Adiga ama qofka ku magacaabay waa inaad wali ku dartaa bogga hoose.
Isticmaal sanduuqa hoose, oo ku beddel magaca isticmaalaha "username": |
Cod
Isticmaale kasta oo diiwaangashan ayaa ka codayn kara halkan in kasta oo kuwa wax yar ama tafatir hore aan si buuxda loo tirin karin Way fiicantahay in la bixiyo sababaha kor iyo hoosba sababtoo ah tani waxay ka caawin doontaa xafiiska xidhitaanka go aankiisa Miisaan dheeri ah ayaa la siinayaa doodda iyadoo leh cadaymo taageeraya haddii loo baahdo halkii cod fudud laga siin lahaa.
Dallacaadda ayaa caadiyan u baahan ugu yaraan 75% oggolaansho oo leh ugu yaraan 8 cod Codadka isticmaalayaasha aan diiwaangashanayn lama tiriyo Si kastaba ha ahaatee codsiyada xidhitaanka xafiiska xafiisku wuxuu leeyahay go aan uu ku xukumo is afgaradka bulshada go aankuna qasab maaha inuu ku salaysnaado tirooyin cayriin ah Bureaucrats waxa laga yaabaa, markay go aankooda kordhiyaan muddada RFA haddii ay dareemaan in samaynta sidaas ay waxtar u leedahay go aaminta is-afgaradka bulshada.
Faallooyinka dhexdhexaadka ah laguma tiriyo wadarta codadka ujeeddooyinka xisaabinta boqolleyda gudubka/fashilka Si kastaba ha ahaatee faallooyinka noocan ahi waxay qayb ka yihiin doodda laga yaabaa inay qanciyaan kuwa kale oo ay gacan ka geystaan fahamka kama dambaysta ah ee xafiiska xafiiska ee is afgaradka bulshada.
clear cache Isticmaal xidhiidhka wax ka beddelka ee hoose si aad wax uga beddesho bogga ku lifaaqan.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.
We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.
Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.
- . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- --Krd 14:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for nominating me, very special to be nominated by no less than three colleague checkusers. Of course, I accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- im
ok with that request. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per TSC. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Tasks