Commons:Administradores

This page is a translated version of a page Commons:Administrators and the translation is 74% complete. Changes to the translation template, respectively the source language can be submitted through Commons:Administrators and have to be approved by a translation administrator.

Outdated translations are marked like this.

Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Esta página é considerada um guia oficial do Wikimedia Commons.

Ela ilustra padrões ou comportamentos com os quais a maior parte dos editores concordam em princípio e geralmente seguem. Sinta-se livre para atualizar a página como necessário, mas por favor use a página de discussão para propor modificações significativas.

Esta página em poucas palavras: Administrators on Wikimedia Commons are users with additional technical abilities to manage the site. They can delete and restore files and pages, protect pages, block users, rename files, and perform other administrative tasks. There are currently 178 administrators on Commons. To become an administrator, users can apply and go through a voting process.

Esta página explica o papel dos administradores (as vezes chamados admins ou sysops) no Wikimedia Commons. Note que os detalhes de suas funções, e a maneira como os administradores são eleitos, podem ser diferentes de outros sites.

Se você deseja solicitar ajuda a um administrador, publique no Administrators' noticeboard.

Há atualmente 178 administradores no Commons.

O que é um administrador?

Administrators as of maio 2025
Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−]

Number of Admins: 178

1234qwer1234qwer4, ru, de-4, en-3
1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1
32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1
99of9, en (bureaucrat)
A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2
Aafi, ks, ur-5, en-3, hi-2, ar-1
Abzeronow, en, fr-1
Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2
AFBorchert, de, en-3
Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1
Aka, de, en-3
Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1
Андрей Романенко, ru, en-3, uk-3, be-2, fr-2, lv-2
Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1
AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1
Anthere, fr, en-3
AntiCompositeNumber, en, fr-2 (steward)
Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3
Auntof6, en, es-2, fr-1
Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, fi-1, pl-1
Bedivere, es, en-4, pt-1
Billinghurst, en
Blackcat, it, en-3, fr
BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1
Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1
Captain-tucker, en
Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2
Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1
Common Good, en
CptViraj, gu, hi-4, en-3 (bureaucrat)
Cromium, en, de-1, fr-1
Cybularny, pl, en-2, es-1, de-1
DaB., de, en-1
DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1
Davepape, en
DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward)
Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3
DMacks, en
Didym, de, en-2, fr-2
Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1
D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1
Ebrahim, en-3
Elcobbola en, de (checkuser)
Ellywa, nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1
Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1
Érico, pt, en-2, es-1
EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat)
Explicit, en, es, ko-2
Ezarate, es-3, en-1
Fitindia, en-3, hi-2, mr-2
FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1
Gbawden, en-3, af-1
Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1
Geni, en
George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1
Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3
Gnangarra, en, nys-1
Gnom, de, en-3, fr-2, it-2, es-1
GPSLeo, de, en-2
GreenMeansGo, en
Grin, hu, en-3, de-1
Hekerui, de, en-4
Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1
Holly Cheng, en, ja-2
Huntster, en
Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2
Infrogmation, en, es-1
IronGargoyle, en, de-1
Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
Jaqen, it, en-2
Jarekt, pl, en
Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1
Jdforrester, en
Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1
Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-2
Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1
Joergens.mi, de, en-3
JoKalliauer, de, en-3
Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2 (steward)
Josve05a, sv, en-3
Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1
Kadı, tr, en-5, fr-2, az-2
Kaganer, ru, en-1
Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1
King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1
Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1
Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser)
Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2
Kritzolina, de, en-3, fr-2, it-1
Léna, fr, en-3, es-1
Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1
Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2
Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1
Magog the Ogre, en, es-2
Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1
Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1
Marcus Cyron, de, en-2
Masur, pl, en-3, de-1
Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1
Matrix, en, ta-2
MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1
Mdaniels5757, en, es-1
MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, no-1, sv-1
Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1
Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1
Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1
Minorax, en, zh (oversighter)
Missvain, en
Mitchazenia, en, es-2
Miya, ja, en-2
Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1
Morgankevinj, en
MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1
Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1
Mys 721tx, zh, en-3
Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1
NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1
Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1
notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2
odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter)
P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1
Pi.1415926535, en, es-2
Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1
Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1
Podzemnik, cs, en-2
Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1
Pyb, fr, en-2
Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1
Racconish, fr, en-4
Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1
Ra'ike, de, en-2
Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1
Ratekreel, ks, en-3, ur-3
Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter)
Red-tailed hawk, en, es-4, pt-2, ug-1
Regasterios, hu, en-1
Rehman, en, si-1
Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3
Revi C., ko, en-3
Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1
Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1
Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1
Royalbroil, en, es-1
RP88, en, de-1
Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2
Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1
Sadads, en, es-3
Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1
Satdeep Gill, pa, en-5, hi-5, es-3, fr-2, fa-1
Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1
Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1
Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1
Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1
Strakhov, es, en-2
TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2
Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1
Teles, pt, en-3, es-2
Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1
The Squirrel Conspiracy, en
Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-1
Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2
Triplec85, de, en-3, fr-1, hr-1, la-1
Tulsi, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, hif-2, bh-1
Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1
VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1
Wdwd, de, en-2
Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3
Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, de-2, as-2, bpy-1
Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1
Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1
Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1
Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1
Yuval CT, he, en-3
Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1
علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward)
Abuse filter, (automated account)
CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request
KrinkleBot, (bot) see request

If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily.

Técnico

Os administradores são utilizadores com habilidade técnica no Wikimedia Commons para:

apagar e restaurar imagens e outros ficheiros carregados, bem como ver e restaurar revisões apagadas
apagar e restaurar páginas, bem como ver e restaurar revisões apagadas
proteger e desproteger páginas, bem como editar páginas protegidas em qualquer nível
editar o namespace MediaWiki
acrescentar ou retirar determinados permissões de utilizadores
configurar campanhas do assistente de carregamento de arquivos (Upload Wizard)
ocultar ou restaurar entradas de registro ou revisões nas páginas
importar páginas de outras wikis
fundir históricos de páginas
modificar filtros antiabusos
não criar redirecionamentos ao mover uma página
ser imune às spoofing checks bem como à lista negra de nomes de utilizadores
mandar mensagens a múltiplos utilizadores de uma vez (massmessage)
usar limites de API mais altos

Estas são coletivamente conhecidas como ferramentas de administração.

Papel comunitário

Os administradores são membros experientes e confiáveis da comunidade do Commons que assumiram trabalhos de manutenção adicionais e foram confiados as ferramentas de administração por um processo público de consenso / voto. Diferentes administradores têm diferentes áreas de interesse e experiência, mas as tarefas típicas de um administrador incluem determinar e fechar pedidos de eliminação, deletar violações de direitos autorais, remover ficheiros sempre que necessário, proteger o Commons contra vandalismo e trabalhar em predefinições e outras páginas protegidas. Claro, algumas dessas tarefas também podem ser feitas por não-administradores.

Espera-se que os administradores compreendam os objetivos deste projeto e estejam preparados para trabalhar construtivamente com os outros para esses fins. Os administradores também devem entender e seguir as políticas do Commons e, quando apropriado, respeitar o consenso da comunidade.

Além das funções que exigem o uso das ferramentas de administração, os administradores não possuem autoridade editorial especial em virtude de sua posição, e em discussões e votos públicos, suas contribuições são tratadas da mesma maneira que qualquer editor comum. Alguns administradores podem se tornar mais influentes, não devido à sua posição como tal, mas a partir da confiança pessoal que podem ter obtido da comunidade.

Sugestões para administrador

Por favor, leia a guia para administradores.

Remoção dos privilégios administrativos

De acordo com a política de remoção dos privilégios administrativos, esta permissão pode ser revogada por inatividade ou uso inadequado das ferramentas administrativas. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.

Candidatando-se para se tornar um administrador

Todos os interessados em se tornar administradores devem passar por este processo e se submeter a um RFA, incluindo todos os ex-administradores que estão buscando retornar às suas funções anteriores.

Em primeiro lugar, leia as informações que se encontram em Commons:Administrators/Howto. Depois volte aqui e faça seu pedido na secção que se encontra abaixo.

Depois de clicar no botão correspondente e de criar a subpágina, copie o link para a nova subpágina, por exemplo "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edite Commons:Administrators/Requests e cole o link no início da seção, depois ponha-o entre chaves duplas para realizar a transclusão.

Se outro utilizador nomeou-lhe, por favor aceite a nomeação indicando "eu aceito" ou algo similar, bem como assinando abaixo da nomeação. A subpágina ainda precisa ser transcluída por você ou seu nomeador.

Na caixa de abaixo, substitua "Username" pelo teu nome de utilizador:

Votação

Qualquer usuário registrado pode votar aqui, embora aqueles que tenham poucas ou nenhuma edição anterior podem não ser totalmente contados. É preferível que você dê razões tanto para apoiar como também para opor-se, assim ajudando o burocrata que encerrar o pedido em sua decisão. Os argumentos, contendo, se necessário, evidências e provas, tem maior peso do que simplesmente votar.

Para o pedido ser aprovado, normalmente requer-se 75% de votos a favor, com um mínimo de 8 votos favoráveis. Não se contam os votos de utilizadores não registados. No entanto, o burocrata que fecha a nomeação pode usar seu poder discricionário para determinar o consenso da comunidade, pelo que a decisão não se baseia necessariamente nos números indicados.

Os comentários neutros, indicados com o modelo neutro, não são contatos nas estatísticas indicadas no parágrafo anterior para que o burocrata determine o resultado da votação. Estes comentários são parte da discussão, podendo persuadir outros utilizadores e permitir que o burocrata entenda melhor o consenso da comunidade.

Purgar o cache Use o link que está abaixo para editar a página transcluída.

Requests for adminship

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for bureaucratship

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rights

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Lymantria

Vote

Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.

We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.

Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.

. Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
--Krd 14:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for nominating me, very special to be nominated by no less than three colleague checkusers. Of course, I accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Votes

Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
im ok with that request. modern_primat^ඞඞඞ^----TALK 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
  - @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. _signed,Aafi ^(talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support per TSC. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comments

Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Requests for Oversight rights

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Tasks

purge Admin backlog

Copyright:

Copyright violations: ~248
Unfree Flickr files: ~0
Recent unfree Flickr images: ~1
Media uploaded without a license as of 2025-05: ~299

Other:

Duplicates: ~50
Advertisements/spam: ~2
Personal photos/selfies: ~46
Other speedy deletions: ~162
Categories for discussion: 84 months
Media requiring a split up: ~0
Requests for unblock: ~6
Undeletion requests: ~30

Protected edit requests:

Full protection: ~5
Interface admin: ~12
Technical: ~0
Template protection: ~7
Protection level: ~0

See also: DR, HMS, …

Ver também