Commons:Administradores
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Esta página explica o papel dos administradores (por vezes chamados admins ou sysops) na wiki Wikimedia Commons. Note que os detalhes das funções, e a maneira como os administradores são eleitos, podem ser diferentes de outros sites.
Para pedir a ajuda de um administrador, publique o pedido no quadro de avisos dos administradores.
Neste momento há 178 administradores na wiki Commons.
O que é um administrador?
Administrators as of maio 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 178
If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Papel técnico
Os administradores são utilizadores da wiki Wikimedia Commons com a capacidade técnica de:
- Eliminar e restaurar imagens e outros ficheiros carregados, e ver e restaurar versões eliminadas.
- Eliminar e restaurar páginas, e ver e restaurar revisões eliminadas.
- Proteger e desproteger páginas, e editar páginas cuja edição só está disponível para administradores.
- Editar o espaço nominal MediaWiki.
- Alterar os nomes dos ficheiros.
- Acrescentar e retirar grupos de utilizadores.
- Configurar campanhas do assistente de carregamentos (Upload Wizard).
- Ocultar e restaurar entradas do registo e revisões de páginas.
- Importar páginas de outras wikis.
- Fundir os historiais de páginas.
- Modificar os filtros de abusos.
- Não criar redirecionamentos da origem ao mover páginas.
- Ser imunes às verificações contra a mistificação da identidade (spoofing) e às listas negras de títulos de páginas e de nomes de utilizadores.
- Mandar uma mensagem a vários utilizadores de uma só vez (massmessage).
- Usar limites mais altos nas consultas pela API.
Em conjunto, estas são chamadas as ferramentas de administração.
Papel comunitário
Os administradores são membros experientes e de confiança da comunidade da wiki Commons que assumiram tarefas adicionais de manutenção e a quem foram confiadas as ferramentas de administração por um processo público de consenso ou votação. Os diferentes administradores têm diferentes áreas de interesse e experiência, mas as tarefas típicas de um administrador incluem endereçar e fechar pedidos de eliminação, eliminar violações de direitos de autor, restaurar ficheiros se necessário, proteger a wiki Commons contra vandalismo e trabalhar nas predefinições e noutras páginas protegidas. Claro, algumas destas tarefas também podem ser feitas pelos utilizadores que não são administradores.
Espera-se que os administradores compreendam os objetivos deste projeto e estejam preparados para trabalhar de forma construtiva com os restantes para atingir esses objetivos. Os administradores também devem compreender e seguir as normas da wiki Commons e, quando apropriado, respeitar o consenso da comunidade.
Além das funções que exigem o uso das ferramentas de administração, os administradores não têm autoridade editorial especial em virtude da sua posição. Nas discussões e votações públicas as contribuições dos administradores são tratadas da mesma forma que as de qualquer editor normal. Alguns administradores podem tornar-se mais influentes, não devido à sua posição mas devido à confiança pessoal que possam ter ganho da comunidade.
Sugestões para administradores
Leia o Commons:Guide to adminship, por favor.
Remoção dos privilégios de administrador
De acordo com as normas de revogação dos privilégios de administrador, estes privilégios podem ser revogados por inatividade ou uso indevido das ferramentas de administração. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Candidate-se a administrador
Todos os interessados em se tornarem administradores devem passar por este processo e submeterem-se a um RFA, incluindo todos os ex-administradores que pretendem retomar esta função.
Em primeiro lugar, leia as informações em Commons:Administrators/Howto. Depois volte aqui e faça o seu pedido na secção abaixo.
- Depois de clicar o botão apropriado e criar a subpágina, copie a hiperligação para a subpágina (por exemplo: «Commons:Administrators/Requests/Nome de utilizador»), edite Commons:Administrators/Requests, insira a hiperligação no início da secção e envolva-a com chavetas duplas (por exemplo: {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) para transcluí-la.
- Se foi nomeado por outro utilizador, aceite a nomeação indicando «aceito» ou algo semelhante e assinando por baixo da nomeação, por favor. A subpágina tem de ser transcluída por si ou pelo seu nomeador.
Na caixa abaixo, substitua "Username" pelo seu nome de utilizador: |
Votação
Qualquer utilizador registado pode votar aqui, embora os votos daqueles que tenham poucas edições ou nenhuma edição anterior possam não ser totalmente contados. É preferível que apresente razões tanto para apoiar como para se
opor porque isto ajuda o burocrata que encerrar o pedido a decidir. Uma argumentação que apresenta provas tem maior peso do que um voto simples.
A promoção normalmente requer 75% de votos a favor, com um mínimo de 8 votos favoráveis. Não são contados os votos de utilizadores não registados. No entanto, o burocrata que encerra a nomeação pode usar o seu poder discricionário para determinar o consenso da comunidade, pelo que a decisão pode não ser baseada necessariamente no número de votos.
Os comentários com a indicação neutro não são contados para determinar o resultado da votação. No entanto, fazem parte da discussão, podem persuadir outros utilizadores e permitir que o burocrata compreenda melhor o consenso da comunidade.
Purgar a cache Use a hiperligação de edição abaixo para editar a página transcluída.
Requests for adminship
Quando concluídas, as páginas listadas aqui deverão ser arquivadas em Commons:Administradores/Arquivar.
- Por favor, leia Commons:Administradores antes de votar aqui. Qualquer utilizador autenticado pode votar, embora aqueles que têm poucas ou nenhuma edição anterior pode não ser totalmente contados.
No current requests.
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.
We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.
Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.
- . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- --Krd 14:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for nominating me, very special to be nominated by no less than three colleague checkusers. Of course, I accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- im
ok with that request. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per TSC. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for Oversight rights
Quando concluídas, as páginas listadas aqui deverão ser arquivadas em Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Por favor, leia Commons:Supervisores antes de votar aqui. Qualquer utilizador autenticado pode votar, embora aqueles que têm poucas ou nenhuma edição anterior possam não ser totalmente contados.
No current requests.
Tasks