Commons:Amministratori
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Questa pagina spiega il ruolo degli amministratori (a volte chiamati admins o sysops) su Wikimedia Commons. Tieni presente che i dettagli sul ruolo e il modo in cui sono nominati potranno differire dagli altri siti.
Se si vuole richiedere l'aiuto di un amministratore scrivere un post su Administrators' noticeboard.
Ci sono attualmente 178 amministratori su Commons.
Chi è un amministratore?
Administrators as of maggio 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 178
If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Questioni tecniche
Gli amministratori sono utenti con la capacità tecnica su Wikimedia Commons per:
- Cancellare o recuperare immagini e altri file caricati, verificare e ripristinare le versioni cancellate
- Cancellare o recuperare pagine, verificare e ripristinare le revisioni cancellate
- Proteggere o togliere l'eventuale protezione alle pagine, modificare quelle stesse pagine che sono state protette da altri amministratori
- Bloccare o sbloccare le utenze degli utenti, come pure gli indirizzi IP individuai o la gamma di indirizzi IP
- Modifica i messaggi di interfaccia meno restrittivi (vedi anche Commons:Interface administrators)
- Rinominare i file
- aggiunge e rimuove gruppi di utenti
- Configurare campagne per il caricamento con procedura guidata
- Cancellare e ripristinare voci come pure revisionare il registro specifico di una pagina
- Importare pagine da altre wiki
- Unire la cronologia delle pagine
- Modificare i filtri di abuso
- Non creare reindirizzamenti di pagine quando queste devono essere spostate e modificate dal nome di originale
- Ignorare i controlli di spoofing e il titolo, o il nome utente dalla blacklist
- Inviare un messaggio a più utenti e contemporaneamente (massmessage)
- Utilizzare i limiti più alti per le interrogazioni API
Questi sono noti nella collettività come gli strumenti degli amministratori.
Ruolo nella Comunità
Gli amministratori sono membri esperti ed affidabili della comunità Commons, i quali hanno intrapreso un ulteriore lavoro di manutenzione: a essi sono stati affidati gli strumenti d'amministratore e hanno un permesso pubblico per quello che può essere un voto/consenso. Diversi amministratori hanno differenti aree di interesse e competenza, nonostante che i tipici compiti degli amministratori comprendono: la determinazione e conclusione di richieste di cancellazione; la cancellazione di violazione del copyright; il ripristino di file se dovrebbe essere necessario; la protezione nei confronti di Commons da parte di quelle utenze che dalle loro modifiche ne fanno motivo di vandalismo; lavorare sui modelli (usualmente chiamati e conosciuti dal termine templates), ed altre eventuali modifiche nelle pagine che sono protette. Naturalmente, alcuni di questi compiti potranno anche essere svolti da utenti non-amministratori.
Ci si aspetta che gli amministratori comprendano gli scopi di questo progetto, e siano preparati a lavorare costruttivamente con gli altri per questi fini. Gli amministratori dovrebbero inoltre comprendere e seguire le politiche di Commons, e dove appropriato rispettare la collegialità della comunità.
Oltre al ruolo che richiede l'uso degli strumenti di amministrazione, gli amministratori non possiedono compiti editoriali speciali in virtù della loro posizione, e nelle discussioni e votazioni pubbliche i loro contributi sono considerati allo stesso modo di un normale utente. Naturalmente alcuni amministratori hanno più influenza, ma ciò non deriva tanto dalla loro posizione quanto dalla fiducia che hanno guadagnato all'interno della comunità.
Suggerimenti per gli amministratori
Leggi Commons:Guide to adminship.
Rimozione dei privilegi di amministratore
Secondo la de-admin policy, i privilegi di amministratore possono essere revocati per inattività o uso errato degli strumenti. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.
Richiesta per diventare amministratore
Tutti i potenziali amministratori devono passare attraverso questo processo e sottoporsi a una RFA, inclus tutti gli ex-amministratori che vorrebbero ritornare in ruolo.
Come prima cosa bisogna andare sulla pagina Commons:Administrators/Howto e leggere le informazioni che sono riportate lì. Dopodiché si potrà tornare qui per effettuare la vostra richiesta nella sezione sottostante.
- Dopo aver fatto click sul pulsante apposito e creare una sottopagina, copia il link nella sottopagina creata, per esempio "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", modifica Commons:Administrators/Requests ed incollalo in testa alla sezione, poi inseriscile fra doppia parentesi graffa (es. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}} ) per includerla.
- Se un altro utente ti ha candidato, accetta la candidatura scrivendo "Accetto" o qualcosa di simile e firma sotto. La sottopagina dovrà sempre essere inclusa.
Usa il riquadro qui sotto, sostituendo Username col tuo nome utente: |
Votazione
Qualsiasi utente registrato può votare, ma in certi casi potrebbero non essere presi in conto gli utenti con poche o nessuna modifica previa. È preferibile dare le ragioni sia per i voti Support che
Oppose, poiché ciò aiuta il burocrate che dovrà chiudere la candidatura e prendere una decisione. Gli argomenti hanno maggior peso dei semplici voti, specialmente se sono apportare prove a supporto della propria opinione.
Normalmente l'approvazione del candidato necessita del 75% dei voti a favore, con un minimo di 8 voti favorevoli. Non vengono contati voti da utenti non registrati. In ogni modo, il burocrate che chiude la candidatura userà il suo giudizio per valutare il consenso della comunità; la decisione potrebbe quindi non basarsi sul semplice valore numerico.
I voti Neutral sono commenti che non vengono contati nel totale dei voti per il calcolo della percentuale. Sono però commenti che fanno parte della decisione ed il burocrate che chiuderà la procedura ne terrà conto.
Purge the cache Usa il collegamento qui sotto per modificare la pagina in inclusione.
Requests for adminship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for bureaucratship
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Requests for CheckUser rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.
We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.
Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.
- . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- --Krd 14:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for nominating me, very special to be nominated by no less than three colleague checkusers. Of course, I accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- im
ok with that request. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per TSC. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Requests for Oversight rights
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Tasks