Commons:Pengurus
Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Halaman ini menjelaskan peran dari pengurus (juga disebut sebagai admin atau opsis) pada Wikimedia Commons. Perlu diingat bahwa detil dari peran, dan bagaimana caranya pengurus Commons dipilih, mungkin berbeda dari situs lainnya.
Jika Anda ingin meminta bantuan pengurus, kirimkan permintaan Anda di halaman Permintaan Perhatian Pengurus.
Saat ini ada 178 pengurus di Commons.
Apa itu pengurus?
Administrators as of Mei 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−] |
Number of Admins: 178
If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily. |
Teknis
Pengurus adalah pengguna Wikimedia Commons dengan kemampuan teknis untuk:
- menghapus dan mengembalikan gambar dan berkas lain yang telah diunggah, juga untuk melihat dan mengembalikan versi sebelumnya
- menghapus dan mengembalikan halaman, juga melihat dan mengembalikan revisi yang telah dihapus
- melindungi dan menghilangkan perlindungan dari halaman, juga menyunting halaman yang dilindungi oleh pengurus
- memblokir dan menghilangkan blokir pengguna, baik alamat IP individual maupun rentang IP
- menyunting pesan antarmuka yang lebih sedikit batasannya (lihat pula Commons:Pengurus antarmuka)
- mengubah nama berkas
- menambahkan dan menghapus kelompok pengguna
- mengonfigurasi kampanye Upload Wizard
- menghapus dan mengembalikan entri log spesifik dari revisi halaman
- megimpor halaman dari Wiki lain
- menyatukan sejarah suntingan dari halaman
- memodifikasi filter penyalahgunaan
- tidak membuat pengalihan saat memindahkan halaman
- mengabaikan pemeriksaan spoofing dan judul atau nama pengguna dalam daftar hitam
- mengirimkan pesan ke beberapa pengguna secara bersamaan (massmessage)
- menggunakan batasan kueri API yang lebih tinggi
Secara kolektif, hak-hak ini dikenal sebagai peralatan pengurus.
Peran komunitas
Pengurus adalah anggota berpengalaman dan terpercaya dalam komunitas Commons yang telah mengambil pekerjaan pemeliharaan tambahan dan telah dipercaya dengan alat kepengurusan oleh konsensus publik/pemilihan. Pengurus yang berbeda juga memiliki area ketertarikan dan keahlian yang berbeda, tetapi termasuk dalam tugas admin pada umumnya juga seperti menentukan dan menutup permintaan penghapusan, menghapus pelanggaran hak cipta, mengembalikan berkas yang telah dihapus manakala dibutuhkan, menjaga Commons dari vandal, dan juga mengerjakan templat dan halaman yang dilindungi lainnya. Tentu saja, beberapa dari tugas ini dapat dikerjakan oleh pengguna non-pengurus juga.
Pengurus diharapkan untuk mengerti tujuan dari proyek ini, dan bersiap untuk bekerja secara konstruktif dengan orang lainnya menuju penyelesaian. Pengurus juga harus dapat mengerti dan mengikuti kebijakan dan pedoman Commons, dan juga menghormati konsensus komunitas.
Selain peran yang membutuhkan penggunaan alat pengurus, pengurus tidak memiliki otoritas editorial spesial berdasarkan posisi mereka, dan dalam diskusi dan pilihan publik, kontribusi mereka dihitung sama layaknya pengguna biasa. Beberapa pengurus menjadi pengguna yang berpengaruh tetapi hal tersebut didapat bukan dari posisi mereka, tetapi kepercayaan individual yang didapat dari komunitas.
Saran untuk pengurus
Silakan baca Panduan untuk kepengurusan.
Pencabutan hak-hak kepengurusan
Di bawah kebijakan pencabutan pengurus, hak pengurus dapat dicabut dikarenakan ketidakaktifan atau penyalahgunaan peralatan pengurus. Dalam permintaan pencabutan pengurus, standar normal untuk menentukan konsensus Permohonan status pengurus tidak berlaku. Yang digunakan adalah "konsensus mayoritas", di mana jika konsensus untuk mencabut hak mencapai 50%, maka itu dianggap cukup untuk mencabut hak pengurus tersebut.
Pengajuan untuk menjadi pengurus
Semua pengguna yang ingin mencalonkan diri menjadi pengurus harus melalui proses ini dan mengirimkannya ke RFA, termasuk semua mantan pengurus yang ingin statusnya dikembalikan.
Pertama, pergilah ke halaman Commons:Administrators/Howto dan bacalah informasi yang tertera di sana. Setelah itu, Anda dapat mengajukan diri Anda di bawah ini.
- Setelah menekan tombol di bawah dan membuat subhalaman, salin alamat dari subhalaman, mis.: "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Namapengguna", sunting Commons:Administrators/Requests dan salin alamat subhalaman tersebut pada bagian paling atas dari halaman itu, lalu masukkan dalam kurung kurawal ganda (cth. {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) pada transklusi tersebut. Minta pemberitahuan daftar pantauan di MediaWiki talk:WatchlistNotice, atau edit MediaWiki:WatchlistNotice untuk menyiapkannya jika Anda adalah administrator.
- Jika orang lain menominasikan Anda, Anda perlu menyatakan bahwa Anda menerima nominasi tersebut dengan menyebutkan "I accept" (Saya menerima) atau kalimat semacamnya, dengan tanda tangan Anda di bawah nominasi itu sendiri. Subhalaman tersebut tetap harus ditransklusikan (langkah di atas) oleh Anda atau nominator Anda.
Gunakan kotak dibawah ini, ubahlah "Username" dengan nama pengguna anda: |
Pemungutan suara
Pengguna yang terdaftar dapat memberikan suara di sini walaupun mereka yang hanya memiliki sedikit suntingan atau belum pernah menyunting sama sekali tidak akan terlalu masuk hitungan. Diharapkan Anda memberikan alasan untuk suara Setuju ataupun Tidak Setuju, karena ini akan membantu birokrat dalam keputusan mereka. Bobot yang lebih besar diberikan pada argumen yang Anda tulis, dengan bukti yang dapat membantu jika dibutuhkan, daripada sekadar memberikan suara tanpa menyertakan alasan.
Pengangkatan biasanya membutuhkan setidaknya 75% persetujuan, dengan minimal 8 suara yang menyokong. Suara dari pengguna yang tidak terdaftar tidak akan terhitung. Tetapi birokrat yang menutup dapat memiliki ukuran tersendiri dalam menilai konsensus komunitas, dan keputusan tidak akan serta-merta didasarkan pada jumlah suara yang masuk.
Komentar netral tidak akan dihitung dalam total suara dalam menghitung persentase yang 75% di atas. Namun komentar-komentar tersebut adalah bagian dari diskusi, dan dapat berfungsi untuk membujuk orang lain, serta membantu birokrat yang menutup dalam memahami bagaimana konsensus komunitas.
Hapus tembolok Gunakan pranala sunting di bawah ini untuk mengubah halaman yang ditransklusikan.
Permohonan status pengurus
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Permohonan status birokrat
Setelah selesai, halaman yang terdaftar di sini harus diarsipkan ke Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.
- Harap baca Commons:Bureaucrats sebelum memposting atau memberikan suara di sini. Setiap pengguna yang masuk dapat memberikan suara meskipun mereka yang memiliki sedikit atau tidak ada suntingan sebelumnya mungkin tidak dihitung sepenuhnya.
No current requests.
Permohonan hak Pemeriksa
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)
- Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)
The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.
We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.
Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.
- . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- --Krd 14:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- Thank you for nominating me, very special to be nominated by no less than three colleague checkusers. Of course, I accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Votes
Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- im
ok with that request. modern_primat ඞඞඞ ----TALK 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Christian Ferrer (talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. signed, Aafi (talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --— D Y O L F 77[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support per TSC. Shaan SenguptaTalk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
Comments
- Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero Parlez Moi 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
- Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. . Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
Permohonan hak Pengawas
When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.
- Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.
No current requests.
Tasks