Commons:Administradores

Shortcuts: COM:A • COM:ADMIN • COM:SYSOP

Esta página explica el rol de administrador en Wikimedia Commons. Los detalles del rol y la forma en la que se eligen los administradores puede ser diferente que en otros proyectos.

Si necesita ayuda de administradores por favor acuda a Administrators' noticeboard.

En este momento hay 178 administradores en Commons.

¿Qué es un administrador?

Administrators as of mayo 2025 Listing by: Language • Date • Activity [+/−]

Number of Admins: 178 1234qwer1234qwer4, ru, de-4, en-3 1Veertje, nl, en-4, de-1, fr-1 32X, de, en-2, hsb-1, ru-1 99of9, en (bureaucrat) A.Savin, ru, de-4, en-2 Aafi, ks, ur-5, en-3, hi-2, ar-1 Abzeronow, en, fr-1 Achim55, de, en-3, nds-3, la-2 AFBorchert, de, en-3 Ahonc, uk, ru-4, en-2, de-1 Aka, de, en-3 Alno, fr, en-3, es-2, pt-1 Андрей Романенко, ru, en-3, uk-3, be-2, fr-2, lv-2 Ankry, pl, en-2, ru-1 AnRo0002, de, en-2, fr-2, es-1 Anthere, fr, en-3 AntiCompositeNumber, en, fr-2 (steward) Aude, en, ar-2, de-2, es-3 Auntof6, en, es-2, fr-1 Bastique, en, fr-3, es-2, la-2, fi-1, pl-1 Bedivere, es, en-4, pt-1 Billinghurst, en Blackcat, it, en-3, fr BrightRaven, fr, en-3, nl-2, es-2, zh-1 Butko, ru, uk-2, en-1 Captain-tucker, en Christian Ferrer, fr, en-2, es-2 Ciell, nl, en-2, de-1 Common Good, en CptViraj, gu, hi-4, en-3 (bureaucrat) Cromium, en, de-1, fr-1 Cybularny, pl, en-2, es-1, de-1 DaB., de, en-1 DarwIn, pt, en-3, es-2, fr-2, gl-2, ca-1, it-1, oc-1 Davepape, en DerHexer, de, en-3, grc-3, la-3, es-1 (steward) Dharmadhyaksha, mr, en-3, hi-3 DMacks, en Didym, de, en-2, fr-2 Dyolf77, ar, fr-5, en-2, it-1, es-1 D-Kuru, de, en-2, it-1 Ebrahim, en-3 Elcobbola en, de (checkuser) Ellywa, nl, en-2, de-1, fr-1 Emha, de, bar, en-3, fr-1 Érico, pt, en-2, es-1 EugeneZelenko, ru, be, en-2, bg-1, pl-1 (bureaucrat) Explicit, en, es, ko-2 Ezarate, es-3, en-1 Fitindia, en-3, hi-2, mr-2 FunkMonk, da, en-4, no-3, fo-2, sv-2, de-1, es-1 Gbawden, en-3, af-1 Geagea, he, ka-3, en-3, ru-1 Geni, en George Chernilevsky, ru, uk-3, de-2, en-2, bg-1, la-1, be-1, fr-1 Gestumblindi, als, de, en-3 Gnangarra, en, nys-1 Gnom, de, en-3, fr-2, it-2, es-1 GPSLeo, de, en-2 GreenMeansGo, en Grin, hu, en-3, de-1 Hekerui, de, en-4 Herbythyme, en, fr-2, es-1, it-1 Holly Cheng, en, ja-2 Huntster, en Indeedous, de, en-3, fr-2 Infrogmation, en, es-1 IronGargoyle, en, de-1 Jameslwoodward, en, fr-1 (bureaucrat, checkuser) Jaqen, it, en-2 Jarekt, pl, en Jcornelius, de, lt-2, la-2, en-2, pt-2, fr-1 Jdforrester, en Jean-Frédéric, fr, en-4, es-1 Jianhui67, en, zh-4, ja-2, ms-2 Jmabel, en, es-3, ro-2, de-1, ca-1, it-1, pt-1, fr-1 Joergens.mi, de, en-3 JoKalliauer, de, en-3 Jon Kolbert, en, fr-4, de-2 (steward) Josve05a, sv, en-3 Jusjih, zh, en-3, fr-2, ko-1 Kadı, tr, en-5, fr-2, az-2 Kaganer, ru, en-1 Kallerna, fi, en-3, sv-2, de-1 King of Hearts, en, zh-3, es-2, ja-1 Klemen Kocjancic, sl, en-3, de-2, hr-1, bs-1 Krd, de, en-3 (bureaucrat, checkuser) Krinkle, nl, en-3, de-2 Kritzolina, de, en-3, fr-2, it-1 Léna, fr, en-3, es-1 Leyo, gsw, de, en-3, fr-3, es-1, la-1 Lofty abyss, en, mt, it-2 Lymantria, nl, en-3, de-2, fy-2, fr-1, zea-1 Magog the Ogre, en, es-2 Mahagaja, en, de-4, fr-2, ga-2, la-2, cy-1 Maire, pl, en-4, es-2, fr-2, de-2, ru-1 Marcus Cyron, de, en-2 Masur, pl, en-3, de-1 Materialscientist, en-4, ru-4, nl-3, fr-1, es-1 Matrix, en, ta-2 MB-one, de, en-3, fr-1, pt-1 Mdaniels5757, en, es-1 MGA73, da, en-3, de-2, no-1, sv-1 Mhhossein, fa, en-3, ar-1 Micheletb, fr, en-3, it-1, es-1 Mike Peel, en, pt-2, fr-1 Minorax, en, zh (oversighter) Missvain, en Mitchazenia, en, es-2 Miya, ja, en-2 Moheen, bn, as-1, bpy-1, en-3, hi-1, hif-1 Morgankevinj, en MPF, en, da-2, de-1, fr-1 Multichill, nl, en-3, de-1, fr-1 Mys 721tx, zh, en-3 Nagy, de, en-3, fr-2, es-1, sv-1 NahidSultan, bn, en-3, bpy-1 Natuur12, nl, en-3, de-1 notafish, fr, en-4, de-3, es-2, it-2 odder, pl, en-4, de-2 (bureaucrat, oversighter) P199, en, nl, fr-2, tl-2, de-1 Pi.1415926535, en, es-2 Platonides, es, en-2, fr-1 Poco a poco, es, de-4, en-3, fr-2, it-2, pl-2, pt-1 Podzemnik, cs, en-2 Polarlys, de, en-2, fr-1, no-1 Pyb, fr, en-2 Pymouss, fr, en-3, de-2, it-2, he-1 Racconish, fr, en-4 Ragesoss, en, de-1, fr-1 Ra'ike, de, en-2 Rastrojo, es, en-3, fr-2, eo-1 Ratekreel, ks, en-3, ur-3 Raymond, de, en-3, nl-1 (oversighter) Red-tailed hawk, en, es-4, pt-2, ug-1 Regasterios, hu, en-1 Rehman, en, si-1 Reinhard Kraasch, de, en-3 Revi C., ko, en-3 Rimshot, de, en-4, fr-2, it-1 Romaine, nl, en-3, de-2, af-1, fr-1 Rosenzweig, de, en-3, fr-1, la-1 Royalbroil, en, es-1 RP88, en, de-1 Rudolphous, nl, en-3, de-2 Ruthven, it, fr, en-4, es-4, nap-4, ca-2, de-1 Sadads, en, es-3 Sanandros, als, de, en-3, fr-1 Satdeep Gill, pa, en-5, hi-5, es-3, fr-2, fa-1 Shizhao, zh, en-1, ru-1 Sreejithk2000, ml, en-3, hi-3, ta-1, kn-1 Steinsplitter, bar, de-4, it-3, en-1 Stifle, en, ga, fr-2, de-1 Strakhov, es, en-2 TadejM, sl, en-3, de-2, fr-2 Taivo, et, en-3, ru-3, de-1 Teles, pt, en-3, es-2 Themightyquill, en, fr-2, de-1, hu-1 The Squirrel Conspiracy, en Thibaut120094, fr, en-2, ja-1 Thuresson, sv, en-3, no-2 Triplec85, de, en-3, fr-1, hr-1, la-1 Tulsi, ne, mai, en-3, hi-2, hif-2, bh-1 Túrelio, de, en-3, es-1 VIGNERON, fr, de-2, en-2, zh-1 Wdwd, de, en-2 Well-Informed Optimist, ru, uk-4, en-3 Wikitanvir, bn, en-3, de-2, as-2, bpy-1 Wutsje, fy, nl, en-3, de-2, fr-1 Yann, fr, en-4, hi-2, gu-1 Yasu, ja, en-2, de-1 Ymblanter, ru, en-3, de-2, fr-2, nl-2, it-1, es-1 Yuval CT, he, en-3 Zzyzx11, en, es-1, fr-1 علاء, ar, en-4, he-1, es-1 (steward) Abuse filter, (automated account) CommonsDelinker, (bot) see request KrinkleBot, (bot) see request If 178 is not the last number on this list, there may be an error or there are some users assigned temporarily.

Aspecto técnico

Los administradores son usuarios que tienen la posibilidad técnica en Wikimedia Commons de:

• borrar y restaurar imágenes y otros ficheros cargados, así como ver y restaurar revisiones borradas;
• borrar y restaurar páginas, así como ver y restaurar revisiones borradas;
• proteger y desproteger páginas, así como editar páginas protegidas a nivel de «solo administradores»;
• editar algunos mensajes de la interfaz (véase también Commons:Administradores de interfaz);
• añadir o retirar determinados permisos de usuario;
• configurar campañas del asistente de subida de archivos (Upload Wizard);
• ocultar o restaurar entradas de registro o revisiones en las páginas;
• importar páginas de otros wikis;
• fusionar historiales de páginas;
• modificar filtros antiabusos;
• no crear redirecciones desde las páginas originales cuando se trasladan;
• ser inmune a las verificaciones antisuplantación así como a la lista negra de nombres de usuario;
• mandar mensajes a múltiples usuarios de una vez (massmessage);
• usar límites de API más altos.

Estos son los conocidos «botones» o herramientas del administrador.

Rol en la comunidad

Los administradores son miembros experimentados y confiables de acuerdo a la comunidad, que realizan un trabajo adicional de mantenimiento, obteniendo las herramientas de administradores mediante consenso público o votación. Si bien los administradores tienen distintas áreas de interés y experiencia, las tareas típicas incluyen determinar el resultado y cerrar pedidos de borrado, borrar violaciones de derecho de autor, restaurar archivos según corresponda, proteger Commons contra el vandalismo, y trabajar en plantillas y otras páginas protegidas. Por supuesto, algunas de estas tareas pueden hacerlas también otros usuarios.

Se espera que los administradores entiendan el alcance de este proyecto, y estén preparados para trabajar constructivamente con otro para lograr esos fines. Los administradores también deben entender y seguir las políticas de Commons, y respetar el consenso de la comunidad.

Aparte de los roles que requieren el uso de las herramientas para administradores, éstos no tienen autoridad especial en virtud de su posición, y en discusiones y votaciones tienen el mismo peso que un editor ordinario. Por supuesto, algunos administradores pueden tener gran influencia, pero eso no se deriva de su posición, sino de la confianza personal que ganaron de la comunidad.

Sugerencias para administradores

Por favor lea la guía para administradores.

Remoción de derechos de administrador

De acuerdo a la política de revocación de los privilegios de administrador, estos permisos pueden revocarse por inactividad o uso inadecuado de las herramientas administrativas. In a de-admin request, normal standards for determining consensus in an RfA do not apply. Instead, "majority consensus" should be used, whereby any consensus to demote of higher than 50% is sufficient to remove the admin.

Para ser candidato a administrador

Todos los administradores interesados deben pasar por este proceso y someterse a una RFA, Incluyendo a todos los ex-administradores que están tratando de volver a su papel anterior.

En primer lugar, lea la información que se encuentra en Cómo. Luego haga su pedido en la sección que se encuentra abajo.

• Luego de hacer clic en el botón correspondiente y de crear la subpágina, copie el enlace a la nueva subpágina, por ejemplo "Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username", edite Commons:Administrators/Requests y pegue el enlace al principio de la sección, luego póngalo entre llaves dobles (ejemplo {{Commons:Administrators/Requests/Username}}) para realizar la transclusión.

• Si otro usuario lo nominó, por favor acepte la nominación indicando "acepto" o algo similar, y firmando debajo de la nominación. Ud. o la persona que lo nomine deberá transcluir la páginas.

En la caja de abajo, reemplaza "Username" con tu nombre de usuario o usuaria

Votación

Cualquier usuario registrado puede votar aquí, aunque es posible que aquellos que tengan pocas o ninguna edición anterior no se cuenten en su totalidad. Es preferible que dé razones tanto para apoyar como para oponerse a los votos, ya que esto ayudará al burócrata de cierre en su decisión. Se le da más peso a un argumento, con evidencia de apoyo si es necesario, que a un simple voto .

Normalmente se requiere 75% de votos a favor, con un mínimo de 8 votos favorables. No se cuentan los votos de usuarios no registrados. Sin embargo, el burócrata que cierra la nominación puede usar su discreción para juzgar el consenso de la comunidad, por lo que la decisión no se basa necesariamente en los números indicados. Los burócratas pueden, a su discreción, extender el período de una RpA si creen que será útil para determinar mejor el consenso de la comunidad .

Los comentarios neutrales, indicados con la plantilla  Neutral, no se cuentan en las estadísticas indicadas en el párrafo anterior para que el burócrata determine el resultado de la votación. Estos comentarios son parte de la discusión, pueden persuadir a otros y permiten que el burócrata entienda mejor el consenso de la comunidad.

Purgar antememoria Utiliza el enlace siguiente para editar la página transcluida.

Requests for adminship

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Administrators/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Administrators before voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for bureaucratship

watch

Cuando esté terminado, las páginas enumeradas aquí deben archivarse en Commons:Bureaucrats/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Bureaucrats before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Requests for CheckUser rights

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Checkusers/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Checkusers before posting or voting here. Any logged in user may vote although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

Lymantria

Related requests:

• Administrators/Requests/Lymantria

• Checkusers/Requests/Lymantria

Vote

Lymantria (talk · contributions (views) · deleted user contributions · recent activity (talk · project · deletion requests) · logs · block log · global contribs · CentralAuth)

Scheduled to end: 14:08, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

The three active Checkusers nominate Lymantria for the position of Checkuser.

We believe that they are highly qualified and well trusted and will be an excellent addition to the team as well as adding languages we do not have.

Lymantria became a Commons Administrator in 2011, with 29 positive votes of 30. They have 133,000 edits on Commons and 19,000 deletions. They are also very active on Wikidata, where they are an Admin, Bureaucrat, and Checkuser and have made almost two million edits.

• .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:16, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
• --Krd 14:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
• The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 13:26, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

• Thank you for nominating me, very special to be nominated by no less than three colleague checkusers. Of course, I accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 14:08, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

Votes

•  Support Taivo (talk) 14:45, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
• im  ok with that request. modern_primat ^{ඞඞඞ ----TALK} 14:54, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support -- DaxServer (talk) 16:13, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Queen of Hearts (talk) 22:51, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Oppose I don't like clubs who choose/deny (on) their new members alone. Inbreeding never was a good idea. So black smoke from me. --Mirer (talk) 23:19, 7 May 2025 (UTC)
  • @Mirer: As the person that led the search for a fourth CheckUser, let me illustrate the process, in case that helps: I went through every case filed at Commons:Requests for checkuser in the last 12 months and made a list of everyone that filed cases that were actionable (had proper rationales that justified using the tool, targeting accounts active recently enough for the tool to work). Then I removed anyone that wasn't an admin, because the community won't approve a CU that isn't already an admin. From there, I looked at who was regularly active on Wikimedia projects (CU isn't as time sensitive as OS, but it's still important that we have ample coverage because sometimes we need range-blocks to stop ongoing, high-volume abuse). Lastly, I checked their RfAs and searched for threads on the admin noticeboards to make sure we weren't putting forward someone controversial (no one was removed from the list at this step). This gave me a shortlist of three folks, and all three of us were comfortable with any of the three of them, so we reached out to all three to gauge interest. Lymantria stood out because they're already a CU on another project. (There really isn't much onboarding for CUs - a few pages on the CheckUser wiki, and asking existing CUs questions on the CU mailing list or over Discord - so knowing what you're doing from day 1 is a huge plus.) I haven't really interacted with Lymantria much prior to this nomination (just one CU case on Wikidata, IIRC). TLDR: This wasn't "let's pick our friends", it was "let's search for folks we think can do the job". The Squirrel Conspiracy (talk) 01:40, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
    • @Mirer: With all respect for your vote, I want to stress that I did or do not belong to the "inner circle" of the three CUs that nominated me. With neither of the three nominators I have had a lot of interaction at one of the projects. Their common action to find and nominate a new CU I interpreted as a sign of urgency/necessity to have more manpower. That convinced me to accept the nomination. --Lymantria (talk) 05:27, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
    • @Mirer: There's no club here -- as TSC says, the three of us believe that Commons will be better served if there are four Checkusers, so we went looking for suitable candidates. I have had very little interaction with Lymantria in the past, but all of it was positive. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 13:50, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support ToadetteEdit (talk) 07:44, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Being an Admin is a tough responsibility and this is more work. But Lymantria can handle the task. --Leoboudv (talk) 07:52, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Christian Ferrer ^(talk) 08:29, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support if it is Lymantria, for sure. No issues. Always seen them as doing what they are doing. _signed, Aafi ^(talk) 08:36, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Strong support I've talked with TSC about the 4th CU in the past, and I think that 4 (or even 5!) CUs can only be a benefit to commons, especially someone who already has experience, is a huge benefit. The only possible downside is that the average checks done by an individual CU will go down, but that might not be a bad thing. Anytime we can avoid being dependent on 1 or 2 people for a critical task, I'm all for it. All the Best -- Chuck ^Talk 15:33, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --— D Y O L F 77^[Talk] 16:35, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Robert Flogaus-Faust (talk) 16:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support --Bedivere (talk) 17:46, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support -- per the comment from User:The Squirrel Conspiracy above. --Schlurcher (talk) 20:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support -- More hands make lighter work, and I trust the 3 nominators on this matter. Abzeronow (talk) 21:17, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support, I think that volunteering to improve Wikimedia projects is too valuable. Lymantria is an experienced user. As they are sysop here, and already have CU rights on Wikidata. So, they are familiar with the CU interface. It is beneficial to have one more CU here. No objections. --Kadı Message 22:12, 8 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per above. Would support more CUs if there are qualified candidates. Lymantria looks like a trusted user. --JackFromWisconsin (talk) 03:14, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support per TSC. Shaan Sengupta^Talk 08:38, 9 May 2025 (UTC)
•  Support Rauenstein (talk) 12:41, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Comments

• Do the current CUs feel that there is enough work for 4 CUs on commons? --Guerillero ^{Parlez Moi} 18:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Yes, certainly. There is a great deal of behind-the-scenes work. .     Jim . . . (Jameslwoodward) (talk to me) 19:23, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

Requests for Oversight rights

watch

When complete, pages listed here should be archived to Commons:Oversighters/Archive.

• Please read Commons:Oversighters before voting here. Any logged in user may vote, although those who have few or no previous edits may not be fully counted.

No current requests.

Tasks

purge Admin backlog

---

Copyright:

• Copyright violations: ~248
• Unfree Flickr files: ~0
• Recent unfree Flickr images: ~1
• Media uploaded without a license as of 2025-05: ~299

Other:

• Duplicates: ~50
• Advertisements/spam: ~2
• Personal photos/selfies: ~46
• Other speedy deletions: ~162
• Categories for discussion: 84 months
• Media requiring a split up: ~0
• Requests for unblock: ~6
• Undeletion requests: ~30

Protected edit requests:

• Full protection: ~5
• Interface admin: ~12
• Technical: ~0
• Template protection: ~7
• Protection level: ~0

See also: DR, HMS, …

Véase también

• Niveles de acceso de usuario
• Sección de inactividad